I have been rewriting the first two chapters of Crossing the Wilderness. The feedback I received was that the writing was good but too sense, making it too hard to get into the story.
This time I cut out quite a bit, making it a shorter, more streamlined journey to get to the meat of the story - when the characters enter The Wilderness. I also made a few changes so that the main character Pierce is not using unrealistic intuition in order to escape from his dire predicament.
Sunday, January 22, 2012
Tuesday, January 10, 2012
Descriptive Rejection
Here is a helpful rejection that I received today:
Dear Dave,
Thank you for being so patient while I've reviewed CROSSING
THE WILDERNESS for possible representation. While I was intrigued by this
concept, unfortunately I had a hard time getting drawn into the story.
Though the writing has merit and even points of brilliance, it is also
extremely dense, unnecessarily so. Although there are many fast-paced
events, it takes quite some time to get through them, especially as the scenes
drag a bit with too much detail and words. I also feel there are too many
convenient solutions. Although Pierce is in a life-threatening situation and
running from the cops in the government bunker, he conveniently possesses a
perfect intuition for knowing when to act and finding the solutions,
repeatedly.
For these
reasons, I must pass.
Please don't
take this rejection as a comment on your writing ability, as it is not intended
to be one. I'm sure another agent will feel quite differently.
I wish you
the best of luck in your endeavors,
I received another rejection a few days ago, with the agent also saying she had trouble getting into the story. It seems I have a problem with my opening chapters, but I may have already burned my bridges with the agents I met at the conference. This has me stressed...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)